A Canadian father who alleges he was bullied and fired by his Japanese employer after he tried to assert paternity go away appeared in a Tokyo courtroom Wednesday to pursue his lawsuit towards the agency.
It’s the second paternity go away harassment case to be heard in Japan in current weeks, casting a uncommon highlight on the problem in a rustic battling one of many world’s lowest delivery charges.
Glen Wooden, 49, a resident of Japan for 3 a long time, was working at brokerage home Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities when his son was born prematurely in October 2015.
Wooden says he utilized for paternity go away earlier than his son was born in Nepal, the place his companion was working, in search of to train a proper assured by Japanese regulation.
However, he says, the agency dragged its toes, and he even submitted a DNA take a look at to show his relation to his son.
“I knew it was a sort of old fashioned thinking type of company but I was still very surprised, even when it was an emergency and my son was in the ICU (intensive care unit), that they wouldn’t let me take paternity leave,” he advised AFP earlier than the listening to Wednesday.
“I think it was viewed really as an act of treason for a man to take paternity leave,” he added.
It was not till Christmas Day 2015 that he obtained approval to take go away and see his son.
Few take paternity go away
He returned to work in March 2016 after bringing his child to Japan however alleges he was subsequently sidelined at work, therapy he says contributed to him struggling despair and taking six months of medical go away.
When he returned, the agency put him on unpaid go away earlier than ultimately firing him.
Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities has denied any harassment, and stated it helps the rights of staff to take their legally mandated parental go away.
However the case, first filed in 2017, comes at a time of heightened curiosity within the difficulty of so-called “pata-hara.”
Final month, a Tokyo courtroom held the primary listening to within the case of a Japanese man suing sportswear maker Asics over allegations he was successfully demoted after taking paternity go away.
By regulation, Japan gives comparatively beneficiant parental go away. Each dad and mom can take as much as a 12 months off, with extra renewable six-month durations if a nursery place is unavailable.
However solely six p.c of fathers take parental go away, in comparison with greater than 80 p.c of moms who use their allowance past the necessary eight weeks after delivery.
The disparity, activists say, is partly as a result of strain from employers and a society that prizes lengthy work hours.
Among the many small variety of males in Japan who take paternity go away, greater than 70 p.c are away for lower than a fortnight.
The Japanese authorities lately introduced it hopes to extend the proportion of males who take paternity go away to 13 per cent by 2020.
There have been solely a handful of fits introduced in Japan by alleged victims of pata-hara, with judges tending to favour employers due to the problem in proving that perceived mistreatment was triggered by staff taking go away, attorneys say.
(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by HEARALPUBLICIST workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)
Get Breaking information, reside protection, and Newest Information from India and all over the world on HEARALPUBLICIST.com. Catch all of the Reside TV motion on HEARALPUBLICIST 24×7 and HEARALPUBLICIST India. Like us on Fb or observe us on Twitter and Instagram for up to date information and reside information updates.